PreviewDescription
ArtistNotes
Portrait Of A Gentleman

by Charles Fraser

ca. 1820
watercolor on ivory
image (oval): 2 15/16 x 2 5/16 in. (7.5 x 5.9 cm)

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Fraser, Charlesnotes
It is unclear who the young gentleman in this portrait is, but his formal dress and fashionably disheveled hair suggest that he was a member of Charleston’s moneyed class.
Portrait of a Gentleman

by James Peale

1789
watercolor on ivory
1 3/4 x 1 1/4 in. (4.3 x 3.2 cm) oval

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Peale, Jamesnotes
In his dress and hairstyle, this young man is presented in a manner very similar to Josiah Hewes Anthony, also painted by James Peale around this time
Portrait Of A Gentleman (1)

by Sarah Goodridge

1821
watercolor on ivory
2 3/4 x 2 1/4 in. (7.0 x 5.7 cm) oval

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Goodridge, Sarahnotes
The inscription on this miniature states it was made November 20, 1821, and was in the “Collection of Edward A. Brown, Reading, Mass., descendant of the artist.” It is probably a portrait of a member of the Appleton-Brown family, to whom Sarah Goodridge was related by marriage.
Portrait Of A Gentleman (10)

by Nathaniel Rogers

ca. 1825
watercolor on ivory
sight 3 1/4 x 2 5/8 in. (8.2 x 6.7 cm) oval

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Rogers, Nathanielnotes
This miniature is typical of Rogers’s early work, employing the oval format he would later abandon in favor of rectangular works destined for display in small hinged cases or frames. The sitter is shown in the costume of a nineteenth-century “dandy,” with a high, pointed collar and elegant velvet lapels.
Portrait Of A Gentleman (11)

by Nathaniel Rogers

ca. 1830
watercolor on ivory
sight 2 7/8 x 2 3/8 in. (7.2 x 6.0 cm) oval

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Rogers, Nathanielnotes
Purchased as a pair, these miniatures are housed in identical frames. Although couples often had matching frames made for their miniatures, later owners sometimes changed frames to reflect more up-to-date tastes. We cannot assume that these sitters are related without knowing more about who they might be, based on the identities of previous owners.
Portrait Of A Gentleman (2)

by John Wood Dodge

1832
watercolor on ivory
sight 2 x 1 5/8 in. (5.1 x 4.1 cm) oval

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Dodge, John Woodnotes
This miniature was painted while John Wood Dodge was living in New York. The unknown gentleman wears what appears to be a tailcoat, with a fashionably high collar and gilt buttons.
Portrait Of A Gentleman (2)

by John Alexander McDougall

ca. 1835
watercolor on ivory
sight 1 1/4 in. (3.2 cm) diam.

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

McDougall, John Alexandernotes
This was originally thought to be a portrait of Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney by an unknown artist. Research has proved this not to be the case, however, and the identity of the sitter is unknown. The work has been attributed to the artist John Alexander McDougall.
Portrait Of A Gentleman (2)

by Henry Benbridge

ca. 1795
watercolor on ivory
1 3/4 x 1 3/8 in. (4.4 x 3.5 cm)

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Benbridge, Henry 
Portrait Of A Gentleman (3)

by John Alexander McDougall

1839
watercolor on ivory
sight 2 x 1 7/8 in. (5.1 x 4.8 cm) oval

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

McDougall, John Alexandernotes
John Alexander McDougall painted these sitters, possibly a husband and wife, while he was in New Orleans in 1839. The artist used different backgrounds for each painting. The plain background of the gentlemans portrait complements the blue of his eyes, while the dark trees surrounding the lady emphasize her pale complexion. Conservation of these...
Portrait Of A Gentleman (3)

by Raphaelle Peale

ca. 1805
watercolor on ivory
sight 2 1/2 x 1 7/8 in. (6.2 x 4.7 cm) oval

Smithsonian American Art Museum

Washington, D.C.

Peale, Raphaellenotes
This man’s elegantly knotted tie clearly shows Raphaelle Peale’s deft brushwork. Although we do not know who the sitter was, he was a man “of means” who could afford fine clothes and the services of one of America’s leading miniaturists.
You are redirected to this page because your browser does not accept cookies and/or does not support Javascript. Please check your browser settings and try again.